New Work

| 4 Comments

Back to the studio. I can't seem to get there as often as I want.

Chris Rywalt, Stephanie, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Stephanie, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

As you can see from these, I've been migrating away from the T&A focus of the paintings I've been doing. I've become really insecure about my work. I have no idea what I'm doing. I'd like to say I've reached a turning point, but I'm not even sure of that. I don't know what's going on.

Chris Rywalt, Stephanie, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Stephanie, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

What I think is happening is maybe I'm not infusing my paintings with the feelings I want them to be infused with. To me, these paintings are about love. They're about beauty. They're about being human. I focus really specifically on the things I do -- on human figures, minus backgrounds, minus props, minus pretty much everything -- because they're what interest me, and they're what I can paint. I'm not a portrait artist, by and large, so I only glance off faces. I'm interested in people. Recently I read something David Hockney once said when he was showing some landscapes he'd painted. He said he thought of them as figurative paintings. "Where's the figure?" Hockney's guest asked, and Hockney pointed to them.

Chris Rywalt, Tina's Hand, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Tina's Hand, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

The trouble is I guess I'm not communicating the viewer as a participant. Back at SVA, during the final group critique, someone -- I know who, I'm just not naming anyone -- when I said I thought of my paintings as being about two people, about love between two people, they wanted to know where the other person was. They forgot that they're looking at the painting. Creating it to a certain degree. I was trying to get at the feeling you get when you're undressing with that special someone. You don't see them all at once, out there, laid out like the Maja or Olympia. You're up close, getting little details here and there.

Chris Rywalt, Tina's Hand, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Tina's Hand, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Now, I didn't -- don't -- approach this intellectually. I didn't think up what I wanted to paint and start painting it. These paintings are based on my drawings starting a few years back, and those drawings grew from my feelings at the time, and something within myself I was trying to explore. The style and the subject developed together, and they developed as I was feeling my way around.

Chris Rywalt, Mia, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Mia, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

But there's a problem. The problem is, being a fat middle-aged white guy, when you start painting naked people, the most easily available naked people are young women, and immediately you're entering into a territory fraught with tensions and entanglements, most of which are entirely invented by the people involved. I mean, there's nothing necessarily requiring that the naked person be under the power of the clothed person. There's nothing requiring that the man be in charge. Nothing but history. It doesn't matter if the personal isn't the historical. Lots of people assume it is, can't escape it.

Chris Rywalt, Cathleen's knees (in progress), 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Cathleen's knees (in progress), 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

I mean, really, if I were a young Frenchman and said that these paintings showed my desire to make love to the world, it'd probably be okay. And if I were an overweight Earth mother, it'd be okay. And if I were an arch ironic Japanese illustrator/toymaker/video artist, hell, it'd be just fine. But I'm working in an area where people honestly believe that all those beautiful paintings from the Renaissance are actually just the exudate of the oppressive patriarchy. There are people who claim that Beethoven's Ninth Symphony is aural rape.

And if people can think that about those, what hope do I have?

So I'm kind of tired of being classified as a pervert. It's not who or what I want to be.

And you know what? Maybe I am a pervert. Maybe this is all about patriarchy and sex and fucking young women, about forgetting that I'm fat and middle-aged and balding and thinking I'm some kind of young stud out having a fun time instead of a cranky, nerdy old guy with a wife and kids in the suburbs. Maybe that's all it is, and I'm trying to fool myself. Maybe I'm trying to leverage what little bit is left of the Old White Male hegemony to get myself a piece of tight little twat. Who knows?

I don't fucking know. I have no idea. I don't know what's going on inside my head or how it relates to what I paint or if any of it matters. It's all crap anyhow. Putting colored vegetable juice on a flat surface for people to gawk at -- I mean, how stupid is that?

Chris Rywalt, Untitled, 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Chris Rywalt, Untitled (in progress), 2008, oil on panel, 16x24 inches

Maybe I should just become a lousy abstract painter. What the fuck difference does it make?

4 Comments

Great works, Chris, especially the second ! Best regards, Hanshttp://artclubcaucasus.blogspot.com/

Chris, I have never found your work to be pervy. A bit graphic perhaps, but that is a different quality. You have some sexism going on if you are being classified as a pervert. My figurative drawings are just as explicit as yours and I am pretty sure that I have never been referred to as a pervert, surely because I am a female drawing females. Unfair. And maybe I am a perv! I love drawing women!You are the artist and YOU get to do whatever you want (this is my mantra when I start worrying about what I am painting and how it might be perceived). Viewers bring their own shit to what they see and you don't have much control over that. It's true, maybe none of this matters, and it all seems stupid sometimes, but then again maybe it all matters. Just do what you love and the rest will fall into place. Ok, that part might not happen until after you are dead, but whatever.

You gotta do your thing. And if that's painting nude women, make the best art out of it that you can muster. Good luck.

That's it, isn't it? The best I can muster. I feel as if everything could be forgiven -- would be forgiven -- if I were creating truly great art. But of course there's no way to know if it's even okay, middling art. It could be complete crap. In which case, it's like, dude, you're making complete crap as an excuse to look at naked women. Might as well draw stick figures. Or, hey, how about this, go to a strip club, where at least all the power and money and sex is out in the open. At least that's honest. Get a fucking lap dance and get it over with already.Someone wrote to me privately and they said, "I can say for sure that your paintings are about the least exploiting depictions of the nude female form I've seen in just about anything." That's probably the best thing I could hear. And thank you, too, Tracy. Although of course you're all products of the patriarchy as much as I am, so maybe we're all just warped together.I do want to note, however, that I didn't post this in search of sympathy, or even empathy. I'm just throwing it out there in case anyone cares what's going on in my head. I'm not fishing for anything. I just want everyone to know that.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris Rywalt published on December 16, 2008 2:23 AM.

Tina was the previous entry in this blog.

Some Drawings from Home is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Categories

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.01