Just Keep Swimming

| 3 Comments

I've been in the studio again. I spent a week or two -- let's call it a week and a half -- in my basement at home, putting panels together with the compound miter saw Santa brought me for Xmas. I'm learning about woodworking, which my friend Dave, who made me some lovely panels in 2007, finds adorable. "They're so cute when they're young," he says. Anyway, after carpentry comes priming followed by sanding. One of these days I'll put together a whole post on my process from start to finish so you can tell what I'm doing wrong.

The important thing, though, is that I made it back into the studio with all the new panels but the largest, which I'm saving. I think I'm going to tackle a reclining nude. Another friend of mine, Joe Bopp, says, "You might get further if you're nice to the reclining nude, instead of tackling her..." Of course he doesn't realize you're not allowed to be nice to the model. They're there to be abused. If you're too nice to them they get upset. Anyway, the important thing here is that I'm going to attempt a reclining nude, like the Venus d'Urbino, the Maja, and Olympia. Make that my stake in the ground.

But the important thing right now is that I made it back into the studio. My previous two paintings had gone badly, but the new day brought new light, and, as Franklin says, "Having a productive studio practice is the ultimate balm for the irritation caused by the iniquities of the art world." And a bad day in the studio is an iniquity indeed.

Chris Rywalt, Lounging in Bed 1, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Lounging in Bed 1, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Lounging in Bed 2, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Lounging in Bed 2, 2009, oil on panel

I realize now I didn't share my earlier two paintings with you, so they're the first two here. As I wrote on Facebook after I did these: I did the first one and then I saw I had a lot of paint left over. I tend to mix more than I need because I hate running out, but then I hate wasting paint, too. By coincidence, I had another panel the exact same size, so I decided to see what would happen if I painted the same kind of thing but without being so precious, without drawing first or anything, just jumping in and painting. When I was done and cleaning up, I noticed that the color scheme looked familiar. Then I remembered I'd used it before. I guess it came out the same since I used the same idea in my head, which is the color scheme of my bedroom.

Fact is, I think both these paintings are pretty lame and I'll probably end up sanding them down. So I wasted the paint anyway.

Chris Rywalt, Sea and Sky, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Sea and Sky, 2009, oil on panel

The next one down was, I don't know what it was. Fooling around. I started thinking, okay, I'll play with the palette knife and then paint over it. Then somehow the painting over part didn't happen.

Chris Rywalt, Squiggles, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Squiggles, 2009, oil on panel

Then came the squiggles. Stephanie says -- the painting's in her apartment for the moment, I brought it by to show her and left it there -- she says, "You need to work on your color theory.  Your painting is sitting in my hallway, and its lack of any particularly interesting color relationships is really getting on my nerves." Of course she likes to bust my hump about my colors.

Chris Rywalt, Bubble-Yum Girl (in progress), 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Bubble-Yum Girl (in progress), 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Bubble-Yum Girl, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Bubble-Yum Girl, 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Head in Hands (in progress), 2009, oil on panel

Chris Rywalt, Head in Hands (in progress), 2009, oil on panel

Then came the two paintings I was happy with. First is Bubble-Yum Girl. The first image here is a good photo of the painting unfinished; the second is a lousy photo of the finished version. After that I decided to do an underpainting for a change, and sketched out the painting you see here. I think it'll go places.

3 Comments

I don't know where to begin.Technical or Inspirational?I wish I was some big wig so that I could give advice, but instead, I sit here not knowing shit."Lounging in Bed 1" turns my crank because of the atmospheric perspective. Not because of the naked person. Of course, I am jaded as my job transforms naked people into props. I am more intrigued by your brush marks, which are expanding.

Sea and Sky is a big jump up from the others. Go look at some Milton Avery landscapes. See if you can out-paint them.

The one thing I do like about those top two paintings, Steve, is the way the blurred outlines in the background look in the first one. In the photo of the painting they look truly photographic, almost like a multi-plane animation camera took the shot. In real life they're less awesome but still kind of neat.My main problem with that one is the face.Franklin, I'd agree that Sea and Sky is a big jump but I'm not sure it's a jump up. Could be a jump over. I'm not sure it's a direction I like.I went looking for some Milton Avery landscapes online and what's the first one I found in Mark Harden's Artchive? Vermont Hills, from the collection of the Rose Art Museum at Brandeis. Complete coincidence.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris Rywalt published on February 9, 2009 3:27 AM.

Erotic Inks was the previous entry in this blog.

Curvy Woman is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Categories

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.01